RSS & Tricolour


Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, who was part of Indian National Congress (INC) till 1923, started Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in 1925 with the initial impetus to provide character training through Hindu discipline and to unite the Hindu community to form a Hindu Rashtra (Hindu Nation). He was deeply influenced by the writings of Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. From the time of its inception, RSS positioned itself as a cultural organisation and carefully avoided any political activity that could be construed as being anti-British.

Dr. Hedgewar, the first Sarsanchalak, instructed all RSS members to participate in political activities [independence movement] only in an “individual capacity”. The formation of the RSS, further increased the Hindu-Muslim divide, as the RSS rejected Mahatma Gandhi’s willingness to cooperate with the Muslims. M S Golwalkar, who became the Sarsanchalak of the RSS in 1940, continued and further strengthened the isolation from the independence movement. In his view, the RSS had pledged to achieve freedom through “defending religion and culture” and not by fighting the British. Thus the nationalistic political base behind Gandhiji during the Non-Cooperation Movement was broken into factions.

The RSS leaders through their shakhas (branches) convinced Hindus that Muslims were despots and religious invaders. This narative worked perfectly for the British, who wanted to be seen as a rectifier of the historical harm inflicted by the Muslims, the invaders. The British had already completed the deeply resented partition of Bengal, in 1905, along religious lines – a Muslim majority state of East Bengal and a Hindu majority state of West Bengal. This Hindu-Muslim divide kind of strengthened the British hands to do the same with British India.

When INC called upon all Indians to celebrate January 26, 1930 as Independence Day, the RSS and its Sarsanchalak Dr. Hedgewar issued a circular asking all the RSS shakhas to observe the occasion through hoisting and worship of its own Bhagva Janda (Saffron Flag), rather than the Tricolour. The RSS continued the practice till 2002 except for a once in 1950 when the RSS hoisted the Tricolour in their HQ at Reshambaugh, Nagpur.

The second RSS Sarsanchalak and the most reviered till date, Golwalkar, published in his book ”Bunch of Thoughts”. He lamented that “our leaders (freedom fighters) have set up a new flag for the country. Why did they do so? It is just a case of drifting and imitating… Ours is an ancient and great nation with a glorious past… Then, had we no flag of our own? Had we no national emblem at all these thousands of years? Undoubtedly we had. Then why this utter void, this utter vacuum in our minds?”

On January 26, 2001, three Rashtrapremi Yuwa Dal activists Baba Mendhe, Ramesh Kalambe and Dilip Chatwani, entered the RSS premises in Reshimbagh and hoisted the national tricolour amid patriotic slogans. The RSS filed a case (FIR No. 176 at Kotwali Police Station, Nagpur) against them. The case file reads that Sunil Kathle the incharge of the premises first tried to stop intruders from entering the premises and later tried to prevent them from hoisting the tricolour. The 3 activists were later were acquitted and were released.

The last time RSS Sarsanchalak Golwalkar had hoisted the Tricolur in RSS HQ was on January 26, 1950. In the wake of Gandhi’s assassination on January 30, 1948, the new Government banned the RSS and the then Deputy Prime Minister, Sardar Patel, wrote to Nehru on February 27, 1948 ”It was a fanatical wing of the Hindu Mahasabha directly under Savarkar that [hatched] the conspiracy and saw it through”. However personal conviction would not compromise Patel’s commitment to due legal process. After investigations were completed, Patel declared quite unequivocally that though “the RSS was not involved… his assassination was welcomed by those of the RSS and the [Hindu] Mahasabha who were strongly opposed to his way of thinking and to his policy”.

Golwalkar repeatedly pleaded with Patel, but he remained firm. Sardar Patel finally lifted the ban on July 11, 1949, only after the RSS pledged to “stay away from politics, not be secretive and abjure violence”. More important, it had to profess “loyalty to the Constitution of India and the National Flag”. But post the death of Patel on December 15, 1950, the RSS went back to their old ways till the 2001 Rashtrapremi Yuwa Dal shocker.

Advertisements

Quid Pro Quo

Quid Pro Quo is Latin, and means “What for what’’ or ‘’Something for something’’. The mutual consideration that passes between two parties to a contractual agreement, thereby rendering the agreement valid and binding.

In politics quid quo pro can refer to the use of political office for personal benefit. For instance, an elected official might promise favorable governmental treatment to a person in exchange for something of value. This form of quid pro quo would be a violation of the law.

The former Chief Justice of India (CJI), Justice P Sathasivam, was appointment as the Governor of Kerala August 31, 2014, post retirement.

Sathasivam

The former CJI was responsible for quashing an FIR against BJP President Amit Shah in April 2013. The professional dictum is that “judges do not speak, they speak only through their judgments”.  Justice Sathasivam had gone out of the way to justify and defend judgement in the Amit Shah case in media interviews, thus clearly violating this particular value of judicial conduct.

 

The 1978-batch IRS officer K V Chowdary, was appointed Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) of India on June 8, 2015, immediately after retirement.

Chowdary

As Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBTD) Chief, when the CBI handed over the documents in the now famous Birla and Sahara Papers, K V Chowdary did not persue the matter. Ideally, the CBI should have investigated the contents of the documents found in its raids. Instead, CBI handed over the sensitive information to the IT department and the CBTD Chief quietly buried the evidence that ‘Gujarat CM’ was paid a sum of Rs. 40 crore and 7 lakh by Birla and Rs. 55 crore by Sahara, in several instalments.

Former CBI Director R K Raghavan was appointed as India’s High Commissioner to Cyprus on August 3, 2017, post retirement.

Raghavan

As Special Investigation Team Chief, R K Raghavan had cleared the then Gujarat Chief Minister Modi of complicity in the 2002 Gujarat riots. He was appointed as head of a Supreme Court-appointed special investigation team (SIT) that probed the Gujarat riots, after allegations of bias against the state police. In the case relating to Modi, SIT said in 2012 that “it had found no evidence to back allegations that the then CM had done nothing to stop some of the worst massacres in 2002”. The court accepted the SIT findings.

Y C Modi, Special Director CBI was appointed Director General of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on September 17, 2017.

y-c-modi.jpgY C Modi a 1984-batch IPS officer was another member of the SIT which probed the Gujarat riots, which gave clean chit to the then CM Narendra Modi. He was part of the CBI team that investigated three cases during the Godhra riots – the Naroda Gam, Gulberg Society and Naroda Patiya cases. This appointment comes at a time when in June 2017, NIA & its special prosecutor in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, Rohini Salian,  spared over going ‘soft’ to protect Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur. The fate of other terror accused like Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit, Swami Aseemanand, Shiv Narayan Gopal Singh Kalsanghra and Shyam Bhawarlal Sahu are dependent on NIA taking the investigations to logical conclusion.

With these example hope you understand the meaning and usage “Quid Pro Quo’’.

Alibi

Just wanted everyone to learn meaning of the word ‘alibi’. An alibi is a Latin word and is ”a form of defense used in criminal procedure wherein the accused attempts to prove that he or she was in some other place at the time the alleged offense was committed”.

Gujarat Minister of State for Women and Child Development, Maya Kodnani was send to jail, in August 2012, for 28 years in the Naroda Patiya riots of February 2002. The Special Investigation Team (SIT) Court called her ‘kingpin’ and decided she would serve the jail term under different Sections of the IPC; 10 years under Section 326 and 18 years under Sections 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder) and 307 (attempt to murder). Witnesses had told investigators that Maya Kodnani, a gynaecologist, played a leading role in the massacre of 95 people – 30 men, 32 women and 33 children – in , an area falling under her Assembly constituency.

Maya

She was granted bail in July 2014 by Gujarat High Court who suspended her sentence on grounds of her sickness and possible delay in trial. In April 2017, she first requested the Special Sessions Court in Ahmedabad to summon Amit Shah and 13 others as defense witness.  After much dilly dallying in the case. Maya Kodnani claimed that she had failed to reach Amit Shah, because he was constantly travelling outside Gujarat. Finally on September 17, 2017 Amit Shah appeared and told the court that Maya Kodnani was present in Gujarat Assembly during the Naroda Gam riot. Amit Shah backs Kodnani’s alibi

Maya Kodnani just establish her alibi.